Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: "frndthdevl" <frndthdevl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Sep 2006 17:26:11 -0700
Neil X. wrote:
You think ones' responsibility to set the record straight on usenet is
more important than a promise to keep information given in confidence
private? Really? You sure you mean that, Jeff?
Peace,
Neil X.
Well since you jsut had to ask
Yes, I think the fact that thankfully he did not lose his job was as
pertinent, or more, in this thread and oh so many others than any
supposition as to how it occurred. Perhaps that info might have kept
all this *** off the screen a long time ago don't you think? Perhaps
this thing would have died a long time ago. Of course now that I have
posted all of about 3 times on this subject in the last year or
whatever it has been, I am sure somebody will say "see your keeping it
going". LOL
I am not saying who did what,or who was more wrong ,that WAS for
others to bicker about. I am just saying even lurkers had feelings
stemming from the fact there were WMD's. in errr uhh that Baker "had
lost his job". I mean you don't think that perhaps some people felt
really bad that he had lost his job? Don't we still kind of at least in
a small bit consider this still a disfunctional type family kind of
thing? How much of the villification and the back and forth could have
been avoided? How much was based on that flufffed intelligence? oh yeah
Jerry really is dead. : (
People still could have been haters on each side,but at least the
overall picture would have been clearer and more accurate. Truth means
as much around here as it does in Washington now?
Why Neil do you think the fact that he really did not lose his job
needed to be hushed up? What was confidential about that other than to
keep one person guessing and possibly in painful remorse. Now the facts
as to why he was still employed did not necessarily have to be gone
over,but that he was not fired yeah. YMMV as usual and as likely. The
fact that she even went to his employers still would have been enough
of an excuse for some to give her the *** they wanted to from the day
she set foot in here. However I think the *** that came after the
"truth" that he had lost his job was wrong.
Never insult anyone by accident.
Robert A. Heinlein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Neil X.
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Richard Morris
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- References:
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: carrie-cox
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: JimK
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: JimK
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: scarletbgonias
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Lfh
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: volkfolk
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Lfh
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: JC Martin
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Lfh
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Neil X.
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Lfh
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Neil X.
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Lfh
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: frndthdevl
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Neil X.
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Prev by Date: Re: Date needed
- Next by Date: Re: Date needed
- Previous by thread: Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Next by thread: Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Index(es):