Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: Jeff <Im.so.Huckin.Fappy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:34:55 -0600
carrie-cox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
SkyYellowSunUSBlues@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:carrie-...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Okay, folks. This is it. Sean Baker was NOT fired from his job nor was
his job even in jeopardy.
WHere's your proof it was never even in jeapordy?
That friends was a total LIE. I called the
ISP of dsvtimeU and inourider, etc...and spoke to Dee the secretary and
she laughed and said, "Oh, don't worry he is fine and is certainly
still works here!" He was never in trouble that she knew of.
I would hope to God the secretaries at my company don't know what goes on between Human Resources and all the employees.
She
forwarded me on to Steve Sideman's voice mail who I told that I never
wanted to get anyone in trouble in real life, that the issue involved
pixels on a screen stemming from issues on a music group and left my
number so I can defend Sean further if need be. Yes people, I will
defend this lying little creep so I can be the righteous person. And I
left a little message on Mr. Baker's voice mail as well asking him why
did he lie?
Who's stalking who now?
and if he had a problem with me to please call me at home.Carrie......please, just stop.
Is this how *Merry Pranksters* operate??
I can not EVEN believe this!!
Carrie>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No...I won't stop. Sean told people like Scot and Roxanne that I got
him fired and it was a total LIE and now I'm doing what I can to make
things right for this rascal.
Okay then...We're starting to get somewhere, but there's still room for improvement. As far as I recall, nobody ever said they knew for a fact Sean was fired. There was a lot of conjecture, and a lot of guesses. Some people said they had communicated with him, and weren't at liberty to discuss it publicly.
If Sean was in trouble with his employer, the secretary probably wouldn't know. He likely had a little conversation with Human Resources and management, and was told not to use company resources for Usenet anymore. So he has complied. If he did tell anyone he lost his job over this, he was in the wrong. But since you're so good at justifying things, can you blame him if he did try to make the person who got him in trouble with his employer look bad? Talk about hypocrisy.
You don't know a damn thing about what really happened. You are still unable to "do the right thing" without blaming someone else. I'll give you an "A" for effort, but it's lowered to a "B" since it was late. And since you still insist on making assumptions about someone else, and blaming them, it's further lowered to a "C".
Nice work. Better than being a complete failure.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: JC Martin
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- References:
- Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: carrie-cox
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: SkyYellowSunUSBlues@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- From: carrie-cox
- Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Prev by Date: Re: Has Anyone Seen Sean Baker This Summer?
- Next by Date: Re: Has Anyone Seen Sean Baker This Summer?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Next by thread: Re: Sean Baker follow up (NDC)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|