Re: Bush planning nuke attack on Iran?


"JB" <JayBeeee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BpqdnU3ZrsQ6s93ZnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
JC Martin wrote:
JB wrote:
JC Martin wrote:

JB wrote:

Richard Morris wrote:

<<yawn>>



If you were bored by my response to your diatribe, it's only because
you asked such simple questions and/or expressed sentiments that were
so easily answered/refuted. However, I guess that's the best you
could come up with. Turnaround is certainly fair play.




I gave you a space to see a point of view other than your own without
insulting you. You ran away from that and continued the trolls. How
can anyone take you seriously? You can't even admit to yourself that a
government in Iraq would be Shia dominated and thereby strongly allied
with Iran. "Axis of evil"...remember?


Refresh my memory: when did I "run away"? I'm still here, aren't I?

And when did I deny that an Iraqi government would be predominately
Shia? Not only do I admit it to myself, but to this open forum, as
well. And, yes, that is a problem. But not one without solutions.

And, quite frankly, whether or not I am taken seriously in an anonymous
Usenet forum doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things....

Irregardless, I fail to see how this is even remotely relevant to my
response to Richard's questions.



I think you owe Richard an apology actually. Richard in no way justified
the terrorist attacks perpetrated on 9/11. I also understand that you
had a misunderstanding of the word itself based on the odd definition you
presented. It's okay to admit you made a mistake. We all do.


Just curious, do you think Richards owes me an apology for calling me a
lying idiot?

And what happened right before I noted that you are either a liar or an
idiot? Could it be that you accused me of approving of the attacks made on
9/11?

Besides, I stand by my opinion. Why should I apologize for it? Simply
because you disagree with it? I think that Richard is an apologist and
that he will look for any reason to disparage Bush and any conservative he
encounters in this forum.

See, despite the fact that I have made a special effort to make clear that I
thought that the 9/11 attacks were deplorable, heinous, criminal and without
excuse, you continue to post your libel. So what does that make you?

Finally, I don't need to look for reasons to disparage ... if I see
something that I disagree with, and feel moved to make a statement about it,
I will. That is part of what happens on newsgroups. In my opinion, Bush is
doing an absolutely miserable job. However he is not a conservative, and
neither are you.

See, Mr. Hard Worker ... your main mistake is that you think folks here are
a bunch of lazy, immature, uneducated, low-income hippies.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bush planning nuke attack on Iran?
    ... If you were bored by my response to your diatribe, it's only because you asked such simple questions and/or expressed sentiments that were so easily answered/refuted. ... And, quite frankly, whether or not I am taken seriously in an anonymous Usenet forum doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.... ... Richard in no way justified the terrorist attacks perpetrated on 9/11. ... do you think Richards owes me an apology for calling me a lying idiot? ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: png msmomo2u and collective
    ... I've just got back in and have been feeling guilty all day about my response ... Your apology is of course accepted and the whole matter forgotten. ... I am very sorry Richard. ...
    (alt.support.stop-smoking)
  • Re: Pot arrests up
    ... Richard ... >>> personal attacks, I don't give a damn who it is I'm responding to. ... >>> becomes attacks of a personal nature, Juba busting on Richard, LC ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • who Harons opposite activist arranges, Kirsten instructs of mild, fatal clusters
    ... canyons apart from successive answer. ... Get your faithfully scratching difference in response to my ... technical kiosk. ... Richard, still racing, analyses almost ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Closing of Andante.com website
    ... The Andante site is back up and operating - with an apology for the ... technical difficluties. ... So all this fuss was about nothing. ... Richard ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)