Re: Bush planning nuke attack on Iran?

Richard Morris wrote:

I love it. You're actually trying to *justify* the attacks of 9/11.

And you are either a liar or an idiot, or both.

Well, well, well....you've quickly descended the level of this discussion to name-calling and personal attacks. Congratulations! It's easy to do on Usenet, isn't it? Are you that disrespectful to people you speak to in person? I should hope not....unless, of course, you would be ready to physically defend yourself. But, I doubt that's the case....you seem like the type of person who can comfortably hurl insults and epithets at people only while hiding behind the safety and security of your keyboard.

Come on, now. Be honest about how you feel. You think that America got what it deserved on 9/11. Otherwise, you would not have such problems with us rooting out terrorists who are looking to carry out similar attacks on US civilians.


Point to one statement of justification that I have made ... just one.

You're trying to make the case we should *not* go after terrorists (despite what happened on 9/11) or the States the give them aid. I believe that we should go after them, and any States that actively support them (even if that means a preemptive strike). I believe that military targets are fair game (and, yes, it can be argued that the Pentagon was a "fair" target...however, using a civilian plane makes it a much more despicable act).

You asked this question, which I answered:

How are preemptive military strikes against Iran materialy different from flying airliners into the World Trade Center?

And, again, the difference is the wanton disregard for civilian lives. If you don't see the difference, then your perspective is skewed.

Let me guess.....do you live in California? I'd bet you do.....
.

Loading