Re: (ndc)opinions wanted


"Tom Beck" <trbeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4418D729.5040901@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Morris wrote:

Oh gee, now you have a moral dilemma. Should you stir the community at
risk of your slot, or should you quietly accept the slot and let the
condition possibly continue unaltered?


And by the way, let me know if you need a strategy that will allow you to
keep you slot, but at the same time, try to correct the glitch in the
selection process.

R.

Perhaps she should attend the meeting she was
invited to first, and see where things go from
there.

Exactly ... my suggestion would be to take the slot, honor the commitment to
not stir ***, but go to the meeting to speak on behalf of others who might
have been shut out by a non-random process.

She might suggest that they institute a truly random process by accepting
applications for a period of time, and then selecting children by lottery if
the number of applicants exceed the number of openings.

That is the fairest way.

Richard


.

Loading