Re: and also
- From: Ken Fortenberry <kenfortenberry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:14:35 GMT
gb wrote:
I'm sure many people here can remember years ago that this newsgroup was all
top post, like all the others.
That's just flat out wrong. In this newsgroup, like all Usenet newsgroups, bottom posting has *always* been the convention. You are mistaken and confused. Top posting did not even become an issue on Usenet until Micro$oft made it the default on their email software and newbies mistakenly used the default on Usenet.
-- Ken Fortenberry .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: and also
- From: mjd
- Re: and also
- From: Brad Greer
- Re: and also
- References:
- why do we have to reply/comment at the bottom of intead of the top?
- From: gb
- Re: why do we have to reply/comment at the bottom of intead of the top?
- From: Ken Fortenberry
- Re: why do we have to reply/comment at the bottom of intead of the top?
- From: scarletbgonias@xxxxxxxxxxx
- exactly my point
- From: gb
- and also
- From: gb
- why do we have to reply/comment at the bottom of intead of the top?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ratdog this weekend in So Cal
- Next by Date: Re: Fingers in the air for DSO?
- Previous by thread: and also
- Next by thread: Re: and also
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|