Re: RMGD is really bummin' me out.

"DG" <xxx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:o7cfp1l9u1u14ol7pj73r9us4jiim7dv0h@xxxxxxxxxx
> Neil X. wrote:
> >
> >
> >> volkfolk wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually I do, (at least in the threads that I am interested in) but
then
> >> again I read the posts from everyone who posts to whatever threads
interest
> >> me. I have never ever killfiled anyone on purpose ( however once I did
> >> accidentally killfile an entire thread) I like having the continuity of
> >> reading what everyone posts to a thread, no matter how irritating I may
find
> >> some individuals
> >>
> >> I have said it before and it bears repeating
> >>
> >> "Kilefiles are for pussies"
> >
> >
> >
> >Gotta say, at this point Scot, it really doesn't bear repeating
> >anymore. It's a vacuous sentiment. Yeah, I've never used a killfile
> >either, and have no desire to start. But just because you and I "like
> >having the continuity of reading what everyone posts to a thread"
> >doesn't mean that those people who think differently are pussies.
> >
> >I'd like to propose the following amendment:
> >
> >"Telling people about your killfile, who is in it, and using it to as a
> >rhetorical weapon in your posts is for pussies."
> >
> >How's that?
>
>
> It sucks... We had some wacko that coined the phrase "killfilters are
> for pussies" and it stuck. Get over your morality...

Well Neil's phrase is fine. But I think it constitutes a "derivative work"
based on the work of the person who coined "killfilters are for pussies",
and therefore Neil should have to pay a royalty to the coiner.


.

Loading