Re: Recooended Dylan?
- From: "Mr Jinx" <vernon__briscoe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2006 07:29:05 -0700
J Buck wrote:
Jinx wrote: <Are you seriously saying you let a little sound quality
stand between you and the arguably the single geatest body of live
performed work period?>
Uh, no. It's not a question of 'a little sound quality'. It's a huge
sound quality issue. Most boots I've heard sound like they were recorded
from Section 10, Row 19, Seat 54, with a 20 dollar cassette tape
recorder that Radio Shack made in 1971. But if that's what you like, be
my guest. I just don't understand how or why you belittle those of us
who don't care for that sort of thing.
Shows from the whole of the NET are available in great sound quality.
There are thousands of them. Literally thousands of hours of Bob Dylan
creating in the moment, trying new arrangements, offering lyric
re-writes and taking the songs to entirely new places. Frankly if you
call yourself a Bob Dylan fan and choose to ignore that motherload I
have to stuggle not to look down on you.
Mr Jinx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- From: J Buck
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- From: Barbara
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- References:
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- From: Mr Jinx
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- From: J Buck
- Re: Recooended Dylan?
- Prev by Date: Re: Recooended Dylan?
- Next by Date: Re: The Color of Sound In Bob Dylan's Music
- Previous by thread: Re: Recooended Dylan?
- Next by thread: Re: Recooended Dylan?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|