Re: Fitzmas continuing investigation,,, is this why?


Johnny wrote:
> Yes. Those that think perjury is a "legal technicality" are fooling
> themselves. Fitz. is extremely thorough and determined --see the story
> in today's Chicago Tribune--and also accomplished (prosecuted the Blind
> Sheik for 93 WTC bombing, for example, and is an authority on the legal
> aspects of counter-terrorism). It is to be expected that if anything
> new turns up--especially if Libby turns canary and fingers either Rove
> or Cheney, which is doubtful-- that we could have a very interesting
> next two years. But the WH document witholding is a matter of
> executive privilege, and doesn't come under his mandate at all. The
> idea that Fitz will be investigating the forged uranium documents from
> Niger is even more absurd. Where would such an idea come from?

He won't have to. Other people are pursuing that investigation. Josh
Marshall has been following this story.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/

I think it will eventually all come out one way or another.

Nicholas Kristof has called for Cheney's resignation. It's still
behind TimesSelect. If there's a kind subscriber who could post it
those of us who follow this thread would be grateful . . . .

.