Re: looters were not criminal
- From: "Dancin Beer" <"Dancin Beer"@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:37:33 GMT
mcisrael@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dancin Beer wrote:
I'm sure there was racist actions in the media because there are racist there. Still had nothing to do with the response.
But to state because one is poor it's all right to steal is dumb.
Yes, that is something that is wrong. The problem is that in our culture, there is more theft occuring that falls into the catagory of 'white collar' theft that is ignored, passed over or punished with far less severity than petty theft engaged in by a black man. We live in a racist and classist culture.
Bet he'd have a different attitude if it was his stuff being stolen.
Anyway, no one doubts that America has long had a racist attitude overall. But Blacks are just as guilty as the Chinese, Indians, on and on. It's built in. Some are worse than others. Anyone that states that they are not prejudice is simply in denial or lying. I've lived with Blacks, Indians, Japanese, Latinos.. you name it. We're pretty much all the same. It's just that White's outnumber the other races in America at the moment.
We have a very long history of racial bias in this country that has singled out black people for very specific negative stereotypes that reinforce themselves through subtle and often unconscious racist attitudes, including internalized racism experienced by black people. What is interesting in recent studies of contemporary racism is the denial that white people engage in when in order to avoid 'feeling racist', while patterns that reinforce beliefs (that black men are more violent that white men, that black women are more promiscuous than white women, that black people are more lazy than white people and prefer to be taken care of by the 'benign white master', that black people are less intelligent than white people, etc.) continue in subtle forms, culturally and psychologically reinforced in our society. This is what I hear in the post by z in this thread. Those of you responding to a different thread should go to that thread and discuss it rather than trying to obscure the comments made in this one. There are indeed people here who have become angry and upset about the fact that a group of black women and children were stopped at a bridge by a group of policemen who didn't want to 'have another New Orleans' in their suburb, but this is not what you are focusing on as a argument against his post. You are simply dismissing what z is saying by calling him a 'troll' and bringing in a completely different post. The quick response by certain people to deny that they are 'racist' is an interesting response. I know I'm not consciously racist, but there are times when the culture that shaped me causes me to have racist thoughts and reactions which I have to battle. This is because I grew up in a racist society - a wealthy white suburb that actually had a clause in it's constitution that disallowed black people to move into it until the Civil Rights movement forced the town to remove it.
http://members.aol.com/neilesl/racism.html
If the shoe was on the other foot it would be no different.
If the shoe was on the other foot I would be saying the same exact thing I'm saying now.
I hate racism but I won't tolerate living in a fantasy world and think by pointing out single instances and stating the entire race is guilty of being a racist.
It's our culture that is racist. We participate in the culture, either as perpetuators of racism or by trying to educate against it and live accordingly.
Blacks as a race have a long way to go and many of their problems are self inflicted.
Our culture, our society, has a long way to go. This includes white people who participate in the perpetuation of racism, often unconsciously, because we often refuse to see the effects of subtle forms of racism within our everyday lives. We, as a society, have inflicted this onto ourselves. White people have the priviledges, black people have the obstacles.
I'm three-quarters white. The rest of me is 'red' and 'yellow'. I grew up in a wealthy suburb. My brother was a criminal. He was violent, committed sexual crimes, and robbery. When he was caught, the judge decided to not send him to a prison because he was afraid he would be abused, so he went to a half-way house. That would never have been done for a poor black kid living in the inner-city. That is what white priviledge is.
Here are some more links that provide some information of modern racism, including some papers on how it is institutionalized in the media, education and the work force:
http://bernard.pitzer.edu/~hfairchi/courses/Fall2000Papers/ModernRacism.htm
http://clinton3.nara.gov/Initiatives/OneAmerica/dovidio.html
http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/ptestimon.html
http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/racial_dynamics/Chapter3.pdf
http://condor.depaul.edu/~mwilson/extra/humor/steoaatv.html
http://www.ivey.uwo.ca/faculty/Dietz-JASP.pdf
http://grove.ufl.edu/~feagin/costs1.htm
Well thanks but I live it first hand. Don't totally agree with everything you say but those are your views as you see them.
My first wife was black so 2 of my kids are mixed. I believe they have a jump on the rest of society because they have the best of both worlds. And they have a very pretty color, hair. the whole deal. My brother also has a son that is half black so we got a pretty good prospective on it.
We grew up in a Black hood and fell in love with very sexy Black girls.
.
- References:
- looters were not criminal
- From: z
- Re: looters were not criminal
- From: mcisrael
- Re: looters were not criminal
- From: Dancin Beer
- Re: looters were not criminal
- From: mcisrael
- Re: looters were not criminal
- From: Dancin Beer
- Re: looters were not criminal
- From: mcisrael
- looters were not criminal
- Prev by Date: Re: John Brown
- Next by Date: Re: Get the SCRAPBOOK??
- Previous by thread: Re: looters were not criminal
- Next by thread: Re: looters were not criminal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|