Re: digest, volume 2453897
- From: "tholen" <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:28:24 -0400
<tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WoHig.10239$Z67.4428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.psychology.psychotherapy,demon.loca
Nightingale writes:
2038> Newsgroups:
l
rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.astronomy
2038> I thought he was American.
2039> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell
2039> Quit being so mean to him.
2040> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
2040> What does that have to do with classical music?
2041> I'm glad you're glad, Tholen.
2042> Newsgroups:
news.groups,soc.men,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,rec.music.classical
2042> Oh shut up.
2042> Practice what you preach.
2043> Newsgroups:
comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,rec.music.classical,alt.fa
2043> Did you ever doubt it, Bruce?
2044> Newsgroups:
n.art-bell
alt.support.autism,rec.music.classical,demon.local,ne.weather
2044> Good to see you admit it, Bruce.
2045> Newsgroups:
alt.support.autism,rec.music.classical,demon.local,ne.weather
2045> Right - I'm not really interested in what the forger has to say.
2046> Newsgroups:
2046> And can I have some? :-)
What does any of that have to do with classical music, Nightingale?
These were posted from nightingale0@xxxxxxxxx using a newserver.
and
HGJ writes:
23> Because I was referring to the person who calls herself Nightingale
23> who isn't an obvious imposter.same
So what? Does that somehow make "Nightingale" real? Is "Art Deco"
also real to you? How about "Tweetie"?
23> The two (or possibly more than two) people in question did use the
23> alias.
So did George Bush and George Bush.
23> It was you who added the quotation marks.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I just check one of the digests from last year - this message was from
Nightingale, no quotes, not Nightingale's normal email address
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.classical/msg/ab1c4e86b603a1d0?dmod
e=source
and it was listed as "Nightingale" in the digest
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.classical/msg/4f398b86cdd02fc4?dmod
e=source&hl=en
23> No.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given that you just
falsely accused me of adding the quotation marks.
No false accusation by HGJ - I didn't check all the "Nightingale" posts, but
I did check several, and the quotation marks were added.
Nightingale Nightingale writes:alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.adv
9> Newsgroups:
ocacy
alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.tasteless,rec.music.classical,soc.men
9> The saucerheads!
9> Fr00tbat
9> Yes.
9> nightbat
9> Kadaitcha Man
9> Yes
9> Yes
9> No
10> Newsgroups:
10> New FORTRAN? That's an oxymoron, Bruce.
What does your lack of familiarity with Fortran 2003 and Fortran 2008
have to do with classical music, Nightingale Nightingale?
These were posted from nightingale0@xxxxxxxxx using google.
alias # today total year 2 year 1
-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------
nightingale 9 136 299 1613
unrequited 26 0 0
nightingale^2 2 10 0 0
unrequited was also a Nightingale using the email unrequited@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't know if it was the same troll as nightingale0@xxxxxxxxxx The
numbers for the Nightingales are not accurate.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: digest, volume 2453897
- Next by Date: Re: What is the problem with wind players and cadenzas?
- Previous by thread: Identify a piece of music please
- Next by thread: Heterophony: Whatever happened to it?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
