Re: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- From: Randy Lane <randy.lane@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 5, 10:29 am, Randy Lane <randy.l...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hard to imagine that anyone who has evenly modestly researched Mozart
Symphony collections would pay even 50% of the price this eBay item
sold for:
http://tinyurl.com/d87rc56
I have listened to the set. I understand many of the drubbings these
recordings have received over the last 10 years or so, though I find
many of them excessive. But to pay that much to have them on SACD
instead of redbook CD?
I suppose this could be case where the seller made a rogue/fake
purchase to make it look like it actually sold for that much. No way
to prove it though.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- From: Oscar
- Re: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- References:
- When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- From: Randy Lane
- When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- Prev by Date: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- Next by Date: Re: OT 47 years ago today, God spoke Loudly, Strongly, swiftly and decicively
- Previous by thread: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- Next by thread: Re: When does SACD/Audio outweigh artistic merit?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|