Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- From: O <owenx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:34:07 -0500
In article
<0878fc91-2eec-4a46-9f1c-1e274b9523d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, td
<tomdedeacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 6, 7:13 am, Terry <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:41:10 +1100, Rugby wrote
(in article
<02d33a09-aca4-4413-8640-7acf54ddb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
On Mar 5, 6:36 pm, Terry <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why not the Liszt Piano Concerto # 1 ?
Rugby
No, *why* the Liszt Piano Concerto #1? You tell us.
I'm reminded of Rosenthal's alledged comment about Horowitz'
Tchaikovsky # 1 : " He may be an Octavian, but he's no Caesar."
Rugby
You'll have to explain that -- to me, at least.
Octavian: young boy, plays octaves.
Caesar: old man, wins wars.
In which case, Rosenthal was quite terribly wrong. Horowitz was a
Caesar, much more than Rosenthal ever became.
-Owen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- From: Roland van Gaalen
- Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- From: Rugby
- Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- From: Rugby
- Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- From: td
- Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- Prev by Date: Re: Rachmaninoff's destroyed Victor recordings
- Next by Date: Re: Maag versus Maag
- Previous by thread: Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- Next by thread: Re: Nominations: music to be excluded/deleted from the canon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|