Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- From: "Norman Schwartz" <nmsz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:00:54 -0500
John wrote:
On Jul 22, 4:48 pm, "Matthew B. Tepper" <oyþ@earthlink.net> wrote:
That may be so, but the earlier "Proty" personalities appeared
benign too. It was the threats and insults later on that showed what
a deeply disturbed and/or troubled personality must be behind that
whole ruse.
I know you can't see this (or can you? Sometimes I wonder) but I'll
have my say anyway. I really don't like to repeat myself, but I am in
no way connected to this "Proty" character to whom you habitually
refer. I *do* know how it started, well, some of it, but I explained
that, or tried to, sometime back in May or early June. You chose to
ignore it, but that's your prerogative. Suffice to say that I have no
intention of explaining it to you all over again. Once is, or should
be, enough.
Whatever actually be the case, judging from past history the stronger such
prouncements the less likely are believable..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- From: John
- Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- References:
- Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- From: John
- Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- Prev by Date: Re: ArkivCD's don't seem to sound very rich
- Next by Date: Re: Hadyn strikes again!
- Previous by thread: Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- Next by thread: Re: Hello, hope all is well!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
