Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Bob Lombard <thorsteinnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:59:05 -0400
Paul Goodman wrote:
On 2009-06-01 12:55:54 -0400, "Frank Berger" <frank.d.berger@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Perhaps I missed this somewhere; perhaps it is obvious. But why didn't you
just start a moderated usenet group instead of switching to Yahoo?
Frank, creating a moderated newsgroup in the rec hierarchy is not an easy process. It involves submitting a request for discussion (RFD) to the group <newsgroups. proposals>. There it is discussed and hashed over. They will ask about how you plan to set up the moderation process, who will be responsible, and whether there will be enough traffic to warrant the group. Eventually the big 8 board would vote on whether to create this group or not. If the group passes it will not change rmcr, it would remain unmoderated, but it would form a competing group with a different name. Not a good idea in my opinion as it would splinter this group just as the yahoo group is doing.
It doesn't 'splinter' this group. The faint-hearted will leave, the explorers will read both boards, the reactionaries will stay, the A&Ts will be here until the dysentery gets them.
bl
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: tomdeacon
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: A N Other
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: number_six
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Paul Goodman
- Re: Progress of the new board
- References:
- Progress of the new board
- From: Bob Lombard
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Dave Cook
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Kirk McElhearn
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Frank Berger
- Re: Progress of the new board
- From: Paul Goodman
- Progress of the new board
- Prev by Date: Re: Cliburn competition
- Next by Date: Re: Cliburn competition
- Previous by thread: Re: Progress of the new board
- Next by thread: Re: Progress of the new board
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading