Re: My Top Unfair Demonstration/Evaluation Classical Discs -- What Are
- From: Kalman Rubinson <kr4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:51:04 -0500
On 4 Mar 2009 20:51:27 -0800, Paul Goldstein
<pgoldste@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You seem to be blurring the distinction between a disc that is useful for
testing equipment and a disc that shows off the outermost capabilities of that
equipment. When I shop for audio equipment, I'm much more interested in how a
sonically mediocre recording sounds than in how a hi-fi spectacular sounds. For
every sonically spectacular recording in my collection, I have at least a
hundred monaural recordings or average stereo recordings - and I play the latter
much more often than the former.
I think both are necessary. I always try to have a range of
recordings, both in terms of program content and audio
characteristics. IMHO, the fundamental common feature is a
very intimate familiarity with the discs.
Kal
.
- References:
- Re: My Top Unfair Demonstration/Evaluation Classical Discs -- What Are
- From: Paul Goldstein
- Re: My Top Unfair Demonstration/Evaluation Classical Discs -- What Are
- Prev by Date: Re: Tom Deacon's love-in with all the pianists in the world
- Next by Date: Re: OT A Memo I'd Love to See
- Previous by thread: Re: My Top Unfair Demonstration/Evaluation Classical Discs -- What Are
- Next by thread: Re: My Top Unfair Demonstration/Evaluation Classical Discs -- What Are
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading