Re: Vaughan Williams 6 - BBC top choice

On Apr 24, 6:44 pm, Peter J <maybi...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24 Apr, 18:28, John Bryant <brit...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Apr 24, 6:19 pm, "jrsn...@xxxxxxx" <jrsn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 24, 8:28 am, John Bryant <brit...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

BTW, I don't think I ever opined that only British conductors should
conduct British music. Perhaps I phrased a response badly. Again.

I don't think you made that assertion, nor was your response phrased
badly. Rather, I think people rephrase other people to the point that
misunderstanding occur. The strawmen are usually more controversial
than the actual participants.

--Jeff

Yes, I see what you mean. Thanks Jeff.

JB.

John

My apologies if I gave the impression you made that assertion. I was
referring to remarks made much earlier (and possibly not even in this
thread......)

AGW Peter- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No worries Peter, I know you didn't make any such assertion.

JB.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vaughan Williams 6 - BBC top choice
    ... I don't think you made that assertion, ... I think people rephrase other people to the point that ... misunderstanding occur. ... Thanks Jeff. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: Vaughan Williams 6 - BBC top choice
    ... I think people rephrase other people to the point that ... misunderstanding occur. ... referring to remarks made much earlier (and possibly not even in this ... AGW Peter ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: "Friendly Premises"
    ... > Sorry for your misunderstanding; I should have made it clear that I was ... > referring to someone else's assertion. ... Surely you are eagerly affirming the proposition that there is no ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: "Friendly Premises"
    ... > Why would you make this bold assertion? ... Sorry for your misunderstanding; I should have made it clear that I was ... referring to someone else's assertion. ...
    (sci.logic)
Loading