Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:41:48 -0700
"Bob Harper" <bob.harper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nOSdnaE40Nz6-0rbnZ2dnUVZ_ryqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
William Sommerwerck wrote:
That's six, not five.
Six is the new five.
This seems like the appropriate comment:
http://curvebank.calstatela.edu/newmath/newmath.htm
I was fortunate to avoid The New Math. The motivation for TNM was sound --
get kids to understand why they were doing something, rather than learning
by rote. The problem is that _basic_ math _should_ be taught by rote -- the
brighter kids will "get it" on their own. Trying to teach principles will
only confuse those who learn at a slower rate.
Unfortunately, it's gotten much, much worse. I recently read about current
math programs that teach things that nothing whatever, even indirectly, to
do with math.
Any science teacher who doesn't teach kids how to use a slide rule should be
fired. There are things you learn using a slide rule that are difficult to
learn using a calculator.
By the way, the original joke was "2 + 2 = 5, for large values of 2".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: Lora Crighton
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: Bob Harper
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- References:
- Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: Andy Evans
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: Rugby
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: tholen
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: William Sommerwerck
- Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- From: Bob Harper
- Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- Prev by Date: Re: 435 Four Seasons
- Next by Date: Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- Previous by thread: Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- Next by thread: Re: Poll - your 5 favourite living pianists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|