Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: aleksios <alex0192@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 13:22:36 -0700
On 2007-04-30 15:50:10 -0400, Andrew Rose <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:
My take on non-lossy compression is that we will embrace it once
(a) general bandwidth increases and (b) overall sales allow for
the investment required.
Sounds reasonable to me.
[...] I want to carry on offering very high quality MP3s [...]
Given your source material, would lossless make a considerable
(audible) difference?
--Alex (the inquiring philistine)
.
- References:
- eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: DmitryG
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: Matthew B. Tepper
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: DmitryG
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: vhorowitz
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: Andrew Rose
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: DmitryG
- Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- From: Andrew Rose
- eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- Prev by Date: Re: 4 Opera Trivia Questions
- Next by Date: Re: CD-R's [was Re: Bruno Walter - Mahler 4 (1953), Tod und Verklarung ....]
- Previous by thread: Re: eMusic: Are the files tagged?
- Next by thread: Re: Munch RCA Japan bonus disc
- Index(es):