Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: "Raymond Hall" <raytoby3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:42:42 GMT
"Thomas Wood" <woodtj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E6SZf.92$tF1.16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Raymond Hall" <raytoby3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XmKZf.2043$vy1.1603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Then I fully assume you will be contacting DG on Lang Lang's new 2nd
effort. Not that I would ever think of buying it. But why not put your
money where your mouth is?
WTF are you talkin about?
Look at the cover on Lang Lang's new Rach 2nd piano concerto recording. Note
the way it is spelled. Note the way it is spelled on VIRTUALLY all major
record labels in the English speaking parts of the world.
Now, work it out. Assuming you can. Get irate with DG of course.
He spelled his own name "transliterated" as he did, for simpletons. Like..or perhaps to outrage pedantic, literalist twits, like you.
you.
At least I have something to be pedantic about. At least I have something to
be literalist about. After all, it is only some composer's generally, and
widely used, name. And, at least, I have never persisted like many here, in
pointing out simple typos.
As for Shaffer, well, he is a lost cause anyway.
Ray H
Taree
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Thomas Wood
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Michael Schaffer
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- References:
- RACHMANINOV
- From: Raymond Hall
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Starobin
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Ronit
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Vaneyes
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Terry Simmons
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Matthew B. Tepper
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Sacqueboutier
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Raymond Hall
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Thomas Wood
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Raymond Hall
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Thomas Wood
- RACHMANINOV
- Prev by Date: Re: Chopin Op.10, No.4 question
- Next by Date: Re: Stoky Question
- Previous by thread: Re: RACHMANINOV
- Next by thread: Re: RACHMANINOV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|