Re: RACHMANINOV

"Thomas Wood" <woodtj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ceIZf.71278$bn3.16915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Raymond Hall" <raytoby3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:w3BZf.1760$vy1.1565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Sacqueboutier" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2006040712094375249-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For me, it's 4 "Rachmaninov", 4 "Rachmaninoff" and one "Rachmaninow".
But, like I said before, they're all incorrect. But it doesn't amount
to
anything, because I know who they're talking about, and that's all
that
matters.

Indeed. The only thing that *does* matter is that one act with simple
human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it
differently.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined
as the "pot, kettle, black" post of the last two decades.

Human decency and common courtesy from tepper .... indeed ...

HA HA HA HA HA

Time to go back to the soccer forums, where some signs of intelligence
may emerge.

How about some decency and respect for the composer himself, who spelled
his own name "Rachmaninoff"?

Tom Wood


Then I fully assume you will be contacting DG on Lang Lang's new 2nd effort.
Not that I would ever think of buying it. But why not put your money where
your mouth is?

He spelled his own name "transliterated" as he did, for simpletons. Like
you.

Ray H
Taree


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount to ... human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it differently. ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined as ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined ... Human decency and common courtesy from tepper ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)