Re: RACHMANINOV


"Raymond Hall" <raytoby3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:w3BZf.1760$vy1.1565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Sacqueboutier" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2006040712094375249-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For me, it's 4 "Rachmaninov", 4 "Rachmaninoff" and one "Rachmaninow".
But, like I said before, they're all incorrect. But it doesn't amount
to
anything, because I know who they're talking about, and that's all that
matters.

Indeed. The only thing that *does* matter is that one act with simple
human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it
differently.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined
as the "pot, kettle, black" post of the last two decades.

Human decency and common courtesy from tepper .... indeed ...

HA HA HA HA HA

Time to go back to the soccer forums, where some signs of intelligence may
emerge.

How about some decency and respect for the composer himself, who spelled his
own name "Rachmaninoff"?

Tom Wood


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount to ... human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it differently. ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined as ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined ... Human decency and common courtesy from tepper ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)