Re: RACHMANINOV

"Sacqueboutier" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2006040712094375249-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For me, it's 4 "Rachmaninov", 4 "Rachmaninoff" and one "Rachmaninow".
But, like I said before, they're all incorrect. But it doesn't amount to
anything, because I know who they're talking about, and that's all that
matters.

Indeed. The only thing that *does* matter is that one act with simple
human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it differently.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined as
the "pot, kettle, black" post of the last two decades.

Human decency and common courtesy from tepper .... indeed ...

HA HA HA HA HA

Time to go back to the soccer forums, where some signs of intelligence may
emerge.

Ray H
Taree


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined ... Human decency and common courtesy from tepper ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: RACHMANINOV
    ... But it doesn't amount ... Coming from Tepper via your post Don, the above advice must be enshrined ... Human decency and common courtesy from tepper ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)