Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Sacqueboutier <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:09:43 -0400
On 2006-04-07 11:46:39 -0400, "Matthew B. Tepper" <oyþ@earthlink.net> said:
Terry Simmons <tlsterry@xxxxxxxxxxx> appears to have caused the following
letters to be typed in
news:tlsterry-1CFBE1.00510708042006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
In article <1144266177.368566.198500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Vaneyes" <vaneyes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ronit wrote:And all of the recordings I have of him (including recent releases)
spell it Rachmaninoff.
7 to 1, the other way, for me.
Regards
For me, it's 4 "Rachmaninov", 4 "Rachmaninoff" and one "Rachmaninow".
But, like I said before, they're all incorrect. But it doesn't amount to
anything, because I know who they're talking about, and that's all that
matters.
Indeed. The only thing that *does* matter is that one act with simple human decency and give common courtesy to those who spell it differently.
Thank you, Mr. Toepper (cousin of Hertha).
:-)
--
Best wishes,
Sacqueboutier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Raymond Hall
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Matthew B. Tepper
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- References:
- RACHMANINOV
- From: Raymond Hall
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Starobin
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Ronit
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Vaneyes
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Terry Simmons
- Re: RACHMANINOV
- From: Matthew B. Tepper
- RACHMANINOV
- Prev by Date: Requested Recordings
- Next by Date: Re: Friday's reviews from MusicWeb International
- Previous by thread: Re: RACHMANINOV
- Next by thread: Re: RACHMANINOV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|