Re: Proof that climate "scientists" have been colluding to dupe the public

Brad Anders wrote:
Most telling is the list of papers of famous discoveries
that were initially rejected.

As you know, most scientists have had personal experience
with less famous discoveries that were initially rejected.

My first publication was accepted by the most prestigious
journal in its area after it had been rejected by a less
prestigious journal. That was just happenstance, but the
more prestigious conferences and journals seem to be more
willing to consider submissions that take issue with
conventional wisdom.

It's not a perfect process, obviously, but it's a process
where truth eventually emerges. That's why I advocate the
submission of papers on the "OT" areas we've been talking
about here to the appropriate scientific journals. They
may be initially rejected, but if there is truth in them,
a determined author will eventually succeed.

Tashi has the necessary determination.

Will
.

Relevant Pages

  • OT: medical journals become increasingly irrelevant
    ... Scientific medical journals like JAMA fail basic credibility ... The Journal of the American Medical Association -- JAMA -- and other ... pharmaceutical companies, gets his study published in a prestigious ... Those are the kinds of activities that true scientists pursue, ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Why_You_Can=92t_Trust_Most_Studies_on_Health?=
    ... Prestigious journals boast that they are ... There also seems to be a bias towards publishing positive results. ... transferring the commodity from its producers (scientists) ... This can be challenging as many times the drug companies will ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Why_You_Can=92t_Trust_Most_Studies_On_Health?=
    ... Prestigious journals boast that they are ... There also seems to be a bias towards publishing positive results. ... transferring the commodity from its producers (scientists) ... This can be challenging as many times the drug companies will ...
    (sci.med)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Why_You_Can=92t_Trust_Most_Studies_on_Health?=
    ... Prestigious journals boast that they are ... There also seems to be a bias towards publishing positive results. ... transferring the commodity from its producers (scientists) ... This can be challenging as many times the drug companies will ...
    (sci.med.psychobiology)
  • Re: Real scientist (Einstein) versus fake scientists (neo-Darwinists)
    ... >against Steinberg was clearly a response to the Intelligent Design article, ... >criticism from intelligent design people because they are not of science." ... >is that the journals would publish papers written by intelligent design ... >submitted by intelligent design scientists are automatically rejected. ...
    (talk.origins)