Re: Chemtrails; what's up with this?

On Nov 19, 6:22 pm, Tashi <dewachen1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:08 pm, Brad Anders <pband...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Nov 19, 7:22 am, Tashi <dewachen1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 Clinger take off your tin-foil space suit and get real.  How many
solar flares were recorded during the Apollo missions....... none?

Here's the data:

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~mikes/moon/flare.htm

As the guy says, the quote from the report is instructive:

"As can be seen in the figure, it is only fortuitous that no
significant SPEs occurred during the lunar missions."

(SPE: Solar Proton Events, a.k.a. solar flares)

Of course, this data is from NASA, so by the rules of the game of
"Conspiracy Theory Fetch-a-Rock, it's of no value because they're
inside the conspiracy. On to the next rock.

Brad Anders

  Here ya go Space Cowboy........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1ltWMbHdDU- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You, know, you're really quite confused, aren't you? Let me try to
help you out, you seem unable to keep it all straight.

1. You've been claiming that one of the reasons the Apollo missions
were a hoax is radiation exposure. The most significant source in
question is from solar flares.
2. Nobody has argued that radiation isn't a problem, or that it a
significant flare could have killed an astronaut in the Apollo program
3. Nobody has argued that NASA wasn't stupid and reckless for sending
people to the Moon with inadequately shielded spacecraft. You may
remember that the Cold War was raging and Russian domination of space
and the moon were major concerns to the US government, hence the
justification for the risks.
4. The fact is that NASA was very, very lucky and no major solar
flares ever happened during the Apollo missions. I even posted the
NASA data in answer to your question.

Van Allen said that manned spaceflight was stupid in general, and
manned missions to the Moon and other planets using existing
technology are extremely risky. I agree, and I think plenty of other
people here, if not all, agree. But it happened anyway in the Apollo
program, and a bunch of crackpots and nuts who don't think it happened
are simply wrong. While shielding on the proposed spacecraft for
upcoming lunar and Mars missions is better than the Apollo shielding
(or lack thereof), it's still not enough to provide complete
protection, and in the case of Mars missions, it's nowhere near what's
required.

And any time you'd like to take it up with any of the Apollo
astronauts still around, be my guest. You won't be the first. I'd stay
away from Buzz, though.

Brad Anders
.

Quantcast