Re: Larry's moon hoax theories

On Oct 31, 10:57 am, Tashi <dewachen1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 31, 11:23 am, "Richard Yates" <rich...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Andrew Schulman wrote:
On Oct 31, 11:22 am, Tashi <dewachen1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After the USA won the space race, ever wonder why we never have gone
back to the moon?

Major budget cuts spurred by lack of interest to keep repeating the
same thing.
Andrew

There is nothing there of use to us. Probably nothing on Mars, either. And,
besides, for that trip (months, not days like a moon trip) cosmic radiation
is a prohibitive factor.

  500 rem and your dead period.  Richard, perhaps you can explain the
lack of an engine blast ( crater) under the lunar module.

I think you need to say why there should be a crater before anyone has
to explain its absence. See http://www.clavius.org/lmthrust.html for
debunking this particular "argument." The rest of the site covers many
of the similarly credible arguments against the moon landings for
those who need this type of fix.
.

Quantcast