Re: OT Pilots for 911 Truth

On Jun 19, 9:27 am, John LaCroix <John.L.LaCr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 18, 4:47 pm, michaeltham...@xxxxxxx wrote:



On Jun 17, 2:05 pm, John LaCroix <John.L.LaCr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 17, 3:39 am, "Matti Partonen" <matti.parto...@xxxxxx> wrote:

"John LaCroix" <John.L.LaCr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:4f8f00eb-2c0f-47b3-83cc-7a2a9544ab6f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  [....]

I don't know which data feeds the flight data recorder (barometric
altitude or radar altitude readings), but here a thought. On climeout
following take off, the pilot's would have reset their barametric
altimeter's to 29.92 mmHg as they passed throught 18,000' (or at least
this was what was done 15 years ago - I admittedly haven't kept up).
If the terrorists didn't reset the altimeter during descent, it's
concivable the baromtetric altimeter could be 100 to 300 feet off..

Competent investigators could not have failed to address issues like this
and to spell them out in their report, something along these lines: "Here we
have an apparent discrepancy. We see the following possibilities to resolve
it ......; we consider possibility x to be the most probable."

Matti P.

Yeah, that's what I would expect, but I haven't seen the NTSB report
(and am probably not competent to
understand it all).

John any thoughts on why flight 93 had no fuel in it's tanks when it
crashed?  Or why one engine was found 10 miles from the crash site?

MT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No fuel in the tanks? I found a reference on the web to the movie
"United 93" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475276/goofs) that states in
the movie there is a shot of the cockpit
showing no fuel in the tanks. Other than that, how did they tell after
the crash that the fuel tanks were empty?

Because there was no fire that burned for hours afterwards, in fact
there is no evidence of a fire one would expect to see with a jet full
of fuel. All the other planes upon impact aledgedly had huge fires
that burned for hours. BTW, John I think your basing your info. on a
made for Hollywood drama.


As for the engine, I don't
know. 10 miles is alot. Maybe when the terrorists rolled the
plane toward the ground they over stressed and engine mount and it
came off in flight.

I would assume the flight data recorder would have indicated an
engine broke off in flight right? On the Pilots for truth website
they have analyzed the black box of United 93 and found such things
that the official version of direction on the crash were different
form the black box, as well as the angle of decent before impact and
many other things.


My guess is that it came off, which means broke or shot off.

John L.

My guess is it was shot down. Rumsfeild in a public statement said
flight 93 was shot down then later corrected himself. I can provid
the quote if your interested.
MT

.

Loading