Re: {OT:} Flight 93 (Caution - Conspiracy stuff)

On May 17, 6:52 pm, Tashi <michaeltha...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andrew, lets be honest you don't have the answers ant more than I do.


Absolutely correct.


Popular mechanics has beed proven wrong time and time agian.


Proven wrong? Maybe, I don't spend as much time on this as many
others. I know that people have claimed them to be wrong, but please
be specific about exactly what they have said that's been proved,
meaning beyond any reasonable doubt to be wrong.

 > has had no hard, indisputable evidence to

prove it ever happened.

  What are you talking about there is tons of evidence, but the 911
commission is over, and anyone who questions the official report is
branded insane by the corperate media.

I don't think anyone is insane who asks reasonable questions, and i
haven't read any major media articles calling conspiracy advocates
insane, based of course on reasonable questions.

There are things that are unknown, Bldg. #7, or Flt. 93, but because
there are unanswered questions doesn't mean the Bush administration
launched a conspiracy.


  Andrew, here a little thing to ponder.... how does a jet ( flight
93 ) with full fuel tanks not burn or show any signs of fire upon
impact?  A little odd to say the least?


You're asking me!?! How the heck would I know!

Bottom line: the official version is that the 9/11 attacks were the
work of Al-Qaeda, the conspiracy version(s) are that George Bush and
*** Cheney formulated a secret conspiracy to do the thing.

Based on everything I know, from all the various sources a person has
in this internet age, the second version is not plausible, the first
appears to be well-documented.

IMO, the butler didn't do it, Al-Qaeda did it.

Andrew


.