Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- From: Che <Comanchetrout@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:47:00 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 3, 6:41 pm, Wollybird <wollyb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:54 am, "ag" <calatrav...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Tommy Grand" <howardj...@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto nel messaggionews:dd3522c7-3081-4347-b221-83e078dee47e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2) something about Segovia being an illegitimate child (and evidently
our own AG commented about this question in one source, and wikipedia
quotes AG saying something completely different, and doesn't that
contradiction just make you wonder??)
Could you kindly provide me with the exact terms of my contradiction? I do
not assume to be a piece of marble in my beliefs and statements, but when
coming to historical facts, I am rather accurate in my reports. And if it
happens I take a mistake, at least I would like to acknowledge it: if this
maybe one case, please let me know.
ag
Tommy Grand should be horse whipped.
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news1206/santacritical.html
Che'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- From: Wollybird
- Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- References:
- Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- From: Tommy Grand
- Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- From: ag
- Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- From: Wollybird
- Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- Prev by Date: Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- Next by Date: Re: Why Johnnie can't sight read!
- Previous by thread: Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- Next by thread: Re: Richard Brune vs Graham Wade
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|