Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Tashi <michaelthames@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:02 -0800
On Nov 13, 11:47 pm, Larry Deack <cg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alcibiades wrote:
I'm now reading The New Bach Reader, and am about 3/4 through this
series:
http://tinyurl.com/yudxve
Notice the sale price. Get it. If you do, know that Greenberg is
married with children. This knowledge will relieve some (some) of the
homo vibe distraction. Most importantly, the guy's teaching ability is
awesome. Aside from my father, I've never heard anyone else who can
speak so articulately about music.
Counterpoint is to music what calculus is to math. Students avoid
them even though they are fundamental to basic competence.
There is no calulus in music just simple arithmatic. Sometimes people
can't see the trees through the forest. For a guy who professes to
know so much math etc. your pretty darn clueless.
MT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Alcibiades
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- References:
- Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Larry Deack
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Alcibiades
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Larry Deack
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Alcibiades
- Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- From: Larry Deack
- Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- Prev by Date: Re: Any new major methods?
- Next by Date: Re: Bach A Maj. Sonata
- Previous by thread: Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- Next by thread: Re: Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|