Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: alcarruth <alcarruth@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:45:50 -0700
Andrew Schulman wrote:
"I am always curious about variance in guitars and this is a big one."
It certainly seems as though it ought to be, but in practice I think
that once you get past a certain point of adequacy it doesn't matter
all that much. Saddle material is generally denser than the wood of
the bridge, and stiffer, so a larger saddle will tend to 'beef up' the
whole bridge a bit. This could perhaps account for the longer sustain
and 'smoother' sound Tashi mentions. But, as you point out, it's
really hard to do A/B comparisons on this one. Perhaps one could make
a wide saddle and a narrow one with a shim, but swapping them out
quickly would still be difficult.
Alan Carruth / Luthier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: Andrew Schulman
- Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- References:
- Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: Andrew Schulman
- Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: Andrew Schulman
- Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: marKo
- Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- From: Andrew Schulman
- Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- Prev by Date: Re: Lagrima bar 15
- Next by Date: Re: OT: My blog, up and running!
- Previous by thread: Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- Next by thread: Re: Saddle Dimensions - Luthiers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading