Re: John Lennon's killer denied parole for fifth time

On Aug 19, 10:32 pm, The Nice Mean Man <hitherand...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 18, 11:13 am, Jeff <yourimageunre...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Aug 18, 4:38 am, RockNRo...@xxxxxxxxx (Manfred Noland) wrote:

yourimageunre...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeff)
On Aug 16, 4:54 am,

RockNRo...@xxxxxxxxx (Manfred Noland) wrote:

Besides, he's done his time. He's paid his debt to society.

The simple truth is Mr. Chapman has served not just 20 years but more
than 20 years. That's cruel & unusual punishment.

Why is that? Why should someone get only about 20 years...for taking
someone's life?
__________________________________
Because the state of New York says so. To keep the por guy in longer is
cruel & unusual punishment. If John were alive now he'd be performing at
rallies to free Chapman.
__________________________________
It violates te Constitution.

No it doesn't..or he wouldn't be kept where he is.
__________________________________
Cruel & unusual punishment violates hte Constitution. Activist judges
creating laws against the will of the peole is also a violation. It's
pick & choose in America.
_________________________________-
John & Yoko were for peace, love, and
forgiveness. They opposed the death penalty like all their fans.

He didn't get the death penalty.
__________________________________

Right. He also didn't get life in prison. He got 20 years with the
chance for parole.
He is suffering and mentally ill. he does not belong in prison. He's a
political prisoner and we know how John & Yoko opposed that.

You're entitled to your opinion.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're... you're so fair, Geoff. That's what you are. Fair. I
certainly didn't expect any backbone from you in the face of an
argument. That much is for sure.

Good to see you again.


I mean, what else do you want me to say...?

The Nice Mean Man

I don't know. I'm not you.
.

Relevant Pages