Re: Strange dream

On Jun 13, 6:05 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mackenzie <jade_...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had this very unusual dream last night about John Lennon.  I
remember sitting in an apartment room with a Beatles record on my lap
and a turntable at my side and when John came in.

"This is your song, John," I said as I slapped the turntable, but the
record I was playing slid off. He just shrugged and went into his
bedroom, so I decided to follow him in. When I entered the bedroom he
was sitting on the bed his face looking at the ceiling. I started
singing "Julia" to him in a soft voice, almost whispering and I
noticed him mouthing the words.

After that---total darkness, sweat on my face.

Hey Mackenzie, I was hoping you would answer an earlier question from
another thread...I don't know if I should take the lack of answer as
oversight or professional diplomacy. ;)

[paste]
Does Rolling Stone really try to make the best lists possible? I have
stronger and stronger suspicions (particularly when it comes to Blender)
that they "sabotage" these lists a little to cause controversy and
water-cooler talk. Sells more mags.

To tell the truth, our editors and the publishing boys decide what
makes these lists and what doesn't. They try to make the magazine
accommodate the interests of three generations: the baby-boomer
generation, generations x and y, by compiling lists of past and
current performers.

I don't believe that our lists are meant to cause controversy but
mostly to sell more magazines. I don't converse with anyone in our
subscription office, but the basic majority of our subscribers are
adolescents and thirty-somethings who listen to bands like Nirvana,
Offspring, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath and hair-metal groups from the
1980s. Our generation has given up on Rolling Stone ever since our
main office changed locations from where it was all "happening" in the
late 1960s.

The lists are, as I am told, supposed to cater to the interests of our
subscribers, but our reporters have little say in what bands they are
intended to cover. There is some suspicion that our editor and
publishers have some connections with the big wigs in RIAA (Recording
Industry Association of America) but no one has offered any solid
proof besides random talk.
.