Re: The five best (not the greatest) 70s rock bands
- From: zepfloyes@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:43:05 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 29, 8:48 pm, poisoned rose
<subscribe...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
zepflo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
1) what percentage of the band's entire catalog those great albums
represent
No I dont. All bands have a peak era last 7-10 years. After that all
of them are crap.
A wholly discardable comment. You're just talking out of your ass,
and trying to be irritating.
2) the differences in quality between albums which reach that
minimum level of greatness -- in other words, your yardstick says a
band with two "A+" albums is no better than a band with two "A"
albums
I never said that. I dont really care for A albums at all. I only go
for A+ albums.
So, once again, you demonstrate the illogic of your yardstick. So,
in other words, if a band has one "A+" album and nine "C-" albums,
That is highly unlikely.
you're going to rate that band higher than another band which has 10
"A" albums.
One of those A might be very close to A+ and I will give that band a
concession. I can hardly think of any band which has 10 A albums. So
again this is a very unlikely phenomenon.
I would rate Sex Pistols over Uriah Heep. Because Sex Pistols have an A
+ album and 0 other albums. And Uriah Heep (based on what I have
heard) have no A+ albums and hardly any A albums.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Beatles should have retired after Sgt Pepper
- Next by Date: OT: Mother Nature will have her way with these people
- Previous by thread: The hippie revolt
- Next by thread: OT: Mother Nature will have her way with these people
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
