Re: Rolling Stones
- From: zepfloyes@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:31:57 -0700
On Aug 31, 2:09 pm, Jales <jales...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31 ago, 15:22, poisoned rose <captainvinega...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd say Aftermath, Between the Buttons, Beggars Banquet, Exile on
Main Street, Sticky Fingers and Let It Bleed are all of
"Beatles-level quality."
Agreed, but The Stones albums didn't have as many songs as The Beatles
ones.
And The Beatles recorded more albums than The Stones in the same
period of time...
so? The more the better? I am hearing this for the first time. You
might never like Yes then. They made 10 songs in three albums (Close
to the Edge, Tales from Topographic Oceans, Relayer)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: Jales
- Re: Rolling Stones
- References:
- Rolling Stones
- From: zepfloyes
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: marcus
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: Barrabas
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: marcus
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: marcus
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: JohnB
- Re: Rolling Stones
- From: Jales
- Rolling Stones
- Prev by Date: Re: Rolling Stones
- Next by Date: Re: Stu and Pete might feel so stupid
- Previous by thread: Re: Rolling Stones
- Next by thread: Re: Rolling Stones
- Index(es):