Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966 <dcrounds@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:22:34 -0700
On Aug 24, 8:37 pm, poisoned rose <captainvinega...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
DayTripper1966 <dcrou...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
You call me bitter? Here are some of your quotes, along with your
clone Black Monk. The most immature thing about them is the CAPS,
which I guess you use to enhance your point when you have trouble
doing it.
You have no ability whatsoever to debate music (and have been shown
to be flat WRONG on several counts), so you just disingenuously
bleat onward about "tone" and other such periphery. What fluff.
There, I capitalized another word for you.
You seemed to omit the infintile quotes I obtained from your posts -
here they are again. Can you comment on how angry I am, and how calm
you are after reading this nonsense:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know how you can sink your
credibility any further at this point, but you're certainly trying
your best.
You are living on Mars. Take your nose out of your Billboard books,
and get some real-life experience with your culture
To find shaky ground to stand
upon would be an improvement over the crumbling hillside you're
sliding down
it's the only way he can imagine people
having tastes which go deeper than his own art-phobic, radio-singles
orientation.
Meanwhile, what an incredible hypocrite you are, taking this
fierce
stance
No, but you do periodically "emerge" in this newsgroup to do almost
NOTHING but vent your bitter, long-held grudges against what other
people think about music. So, your pose of tolerance is a joke.
Well, I certainly know a lot more than you do,
This is a totally disingenuous reply. (my response)Because I
am not
giving the answer you want; therefore I must be
lying)
Wow, your tastes really dig DEEP, don't they?
Wow, you DO dig deep! Just wait until you discover Fleetwood Mac!
Here you go again, smearing the opposition with negative hyperboles.
There are just so ways in which your statements are nonsensical that
it's hard to even organize a reply. It's as if there are three
unsound assertions in every sentence you write.
If you want to see why, look up the extract from his book posted on
Amazon. His writing is just APPALLINGLY amateurish. Absolutely no
idea how to structure an essay. None. It's as if he has never read a
book himself. Which could be true,
And there doesn't seem to
be any room in this bigoted characterization for liking mainstream
AND non-mainstream music either.
Your writing IS appallingly
amateurish, and you DON'T have any idea how to structure.
Maybe you should see a counselor, to talk about these "elite" music
fans who so ferociously upset you and have become such a crippling
bugaboo.
Boy, the "ignorance" meter may have to be entirely re-calibrated,
just to accommodate you.
.
- References:
- Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: Jeff
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: Sean Carroll
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: Jeff
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- From: DayTripper1966
- Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- Prev by Date: Re: Who Were The Drunkin Failures?
- Next by Date: Re: Who Were The Drunkin Failures?
- Previous by thread: Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- Next by thread: Re: Beatles compared to post-Beatles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|