Re: An alternative view of our lads
- From: Barbara & Wim Meijnen & Kombrink <bawimeko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:02:02 +0200
^^indifference^^ schreef:
"R.A.G. Seely" <rags__A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Xns97BA1D98B23C9linearfunctoroperama@xxxxxxxxxxxxYou can't even respond to the author about the mistakes he makes..pity. It's a anti-beatle sermon, based on the wrong facts.
http://www.scaruffi.com/vol1/beatles.html
--
-= rags =-
<rags AT math . mcgill . ca>
<http://www.math.mcgill.ca/rags>
Eliminate Spam with Mailwasher Pro
<http://fta.firetrust.com/index.cgi?id=290&page=1>
Maybe even a 'WTF?' view....
"The Beatles had the historical function to serve as champions of the reaction. Their smiles and their choruses hid the revolution: they concealed the restlessness of an underground movement ready to explode, for a bourgeoisie who wanted to hear nothing about it.
They had nothing to say and that's why they didn't say it. "
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An alternative view of our lads
- From: Slip Kid
- Re: An alternative view of our lads
- From: appeyroad
- Re: An alternative view of our lads
- References:
- An alternative view of our lads
- From: R.A.G. Seely
- An alternative view of our lads
- Prev by Date: Re: Keith Richards To Have Surgery
- Next by Date: Re: Lennon's last photo
- Previous by thread: An alternative view of our lads
- Next by thread: Re: An alternative view of our lads
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
