Re: Can't Read Music
- From: Yourimageunreels@xxxxxxxxx (Jeff -)
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:47:47 -0600
>>dcaccavonojunk@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>(Danny Caccavo)
>>In article
>><1138590240.355020.62910@o13g2000cwo
>>googlegroups.com>, "Bloodrock"
>><barrystoller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Without George Martin's trained
>>musicianship, the Fabs would have gone
>>only half the distance. Listen to those dreary
>>string charts on JL solo albums to imagine
>>the damage possible to the classic Beatle
>>albums. Not that Martin was very innovative
>>- his stuff is really bland compared to guys
>>like Monty Kelly, Van Dyke Parks, Tom
>>Baker, etc. - but Martin's prosaic approach
>>was probably a commercial asset,
>>considering the sound effects and emphasis
>>on simple melodies.
>>Let's put it another way....
>>Imagine how far they might have gone if they
>>were trained musicians....if such a thing is
>>possible for them to have gone further than
>>they did.....
>>dc
Listen to all of the trained musicians out there, and how crappy their
music is..and there is your
answer.
Jeff
--
Check Out This Fantastic Classical Guitarist
Margaret Slovak
http://www.rhapsody.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can't Read Music
- From: Lizz Holmans
- Re: Can't Read Music
- From: JohnB
- Re: Can't Read Music
- References:
- Re: Can't Read Music
- From: Danny Caccavo
- Re: Can't Read Music
- Prev by Date: Re: Paul's spookiest songs?
- Next by Date: Re: Was Linda McCartney really that much a better *** than Yoko?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can't Read Music
- Next by thread: Re: Can't Read Music
- Index(es):