Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: "Lookingglass" <Shemakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:49:09 -0800
"abe slaney" <abeslaneyis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Bkrtf.56993$XC4.16324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lookingglass wrote:
>
>
>> Censorship... free speech... ring any bells? You assume much... being
>> liberal OR conservative has nothing to do with it.
>
> This idea was expressed in this group some time back during the Great
> Dixie Chicks Scare. But, who is being censored? In this case, a citizen
> group exercised their right to free speech regarding a media product. The
> manufacturer/distributor of that product, for whatever reason (and this
> may have been to their benefit) pulled the product. That was their choice;
> they were under no legal obligation to do so.
> Where do you see censorship? Be fair.
I do not deny organized religion the right to show their superstitious
programming on TV... why do they want to deny me the right to view a satiric
cartoon that pokes fun at those superstitions...? If they don't like the
program, no one is forcing them to watch... just like I don't watch the
religious programming...!
Where is the lack of fairness in this?
dave (...now we know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall...)
www.Shemakhan.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: abe slaney
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- References:
- OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: Saucy Jack
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- From: abe slaney
- OT: Catholic Censorship
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- Next by Date: Re: Why was Chapman only charged with second-degree murder?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Catholic Censorship
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
