Re: "Ginger Gilligan" What a mindless meathead.
- From: "aguafina" <a22wst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:20:23 -0800
"Ginger Gilligan" <aeriewindsong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130745740.957624.266820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> memcdr wrote:
>
> > >No, I am NOT going to leave. You are not King. You don't decide who
> > stays and who goes.
> >
> > (WAAAAAH WAAAAAH!!! she cried!
> > If that were so your ass would be one of the first to be tossed high and
> > hard, yes. But I never said I was "king", Miss Hyperbole. I never said
> > ANYthing of the kind.
>
> You ACT like it, imbecile.
Wow, witty riposte there.
No, dear, I do not "act" like anything of the sort. However, your act is
old and tiresome. In every form you post in. As anyone can easily find.
>
> > You have two , well, 3 choices. Killfile, leave, or ignore. That's IT.
>
> No, that is NOT it, ***-for-brains. I can respond to you in the way I
> see fit because it makes me feel BETTER.
Exactly. In your fevered little lump of a brain your self-esteem is tied
into attacking me. And that doesn't make you wonder? Even a little bit?
Well, no I guess it wouldn't.
>
> > Then your "replies" are spit all over your computer in your impotent
little
> > rage against me (and all it is *is* impotent whining), say whatever is
on
> > your little peabrain, or shut up. Guess which one I'd vote for? :)
>
> Um, you don't have a say in the matter.
Sure I do. Harassment can easily go two ways, little one.
>
> > >>Yes, it *IS* that hard to killfile you because you
> > keep changing your name every two seconds, you stupid retard.
> >
> > Aw. Well, my heart does bleed for you. Since I have no control over
when
> > and how I need to change my name it's not really an issue, and given
that
> > *you* started this slagfest thread, someone with ANY intelligence might
> > conclude that, should they want to avoid me, they should not read my
replies
> > here.
>
> But most of time I don't even know it's YOU until I've read some really
> stupid crap and think "Now this sounds familiar. . ." Ugh.
LOL. You really are a piece of work. Ugh indeed.
>
> > Of course, they shouldn't start pointless self-serving insult threads
> > either, but I don't want to give you too much in one day, I'm sure
you'll
> > have a headache as it is from all this thinking.
>
> My headache is from your *attitude*.
The attituide that caused me to start these threads about me? Oh wait, that
was YOU.
Yes, well I can certainly fall right in love with YOUR attitude, that's for
sure.
You'll have an attitude too, sweetcheeks, when you're attacked constantly by
unknown and unseen persons with God knows what agenda.
> > > Also,
> > you will never see me post with stupid stuff like "yawn" and "zzzzzzz".
> >
> >
> > Yeah, your posts are FILLED with the stunning kind of brilliant insights
> > only found in the great classics. LOL!!!!
>
> It's still 1,000x better than ANYthing YOU "write".
Sure, keep telling yourself that, Hemingway. Or should I say Sherwood
Schwartz? God, now THERE was a brilliant author!
>
> > > If I *do* find a post boring, then I *DO SKIP* it. I do so out of
> > *respect* for *other people* who *might* find the "boring" post
> > interesting.
> >
> >
> > Ah, "respect"... You display SO much of it here. Woo-woo!
>
> Not for YOU, peabrain.
Not for anyone, shitlips.
>
> > >I, unlike you, understand that other people may feel
> > differently than I do.
> >
> > I understand that I feel differently than you on every insignifiant
little
> > piece of crap you've ever uttered, from Bob Denver's death on down to
today.
>
> Well good, I'm glad you realize that.
With your screaming help, of course, otherwise how would I have known (or
cared?)...
>
> > >Posting "yawn" or "zzzzz" is just pointless and
> > may kill the thread, which would be a shame for someone else who *does*
> > find the thread interesting.
> >
> > Yes, wouldn't it be a shame if this attack thread died? Wel, for you,
not
> > for me.
>
> I don't mean *this* thread, dummy. I mean in general. *sigh*
Oh. Hey! Try writing what you mean. Let's see how THAT works!
>
> > Yawn or zzzz (which is as innocuous as 'maroon, except, apparently, for
real
> > actual maroons) are valid statements. Indicating (I cannot fucking
believe
> > I have to even explain this to a brain dead person such as you) that the
> > person spewing (usually you) is making NO point whatsoever, and if there
is
> > a germ of an actual idea there it is so insignificant as to be
coma-inducing
> > boring.
>
> So why bother to read it then? Why respond at all? Why waste
> bandwidth? Why hurt somebody's feelings unnecessarily? If the post is
> so boring, why don't you add something to it to make it *interesting*?
Are you talking to yourself again? You sure could be, pot-kettle-irony.
>
> > Boy your head must really be smarting now, all this new knowledge, huh?.
>
> No, not at all. Amused at your frantic foaming at the mouth, maybe. .
LOL. Nice try. Weak, but perfectly able to get your foot in the door at
Troll Kindergarten.
> .
>
>
> >
> > Well, then allow me to finish your thought.
> >
> > A *** like you decides for unknown reasons to start an entire thread
about
> > someone you've had little contact with, and when said thread flags each
> > weekend (presumably you're on work furlough today) you have to goose it
back
> > up to hysterical levels (especially when i don't bother replying to
you).
>
> I *lurk* here, idiot.
Loud lurking. Go look up the word.
I *read* almost everything you post.
Aw. I'm touched.
I finally
> said the things I've always wanted to say.
Wow, did you cum? Was it THAT good for you? You've been at my heels for
years, I guess not being noticed built up too much for you, huh? Yep, that
old-kick-Chuckles-to-goose-my-own-bent-self-esteem is really the secret to a
sucessful life!
I was especially appauled
> at your arguments with fattachus. If he doesn't like Yoko, that's
> FINE. There's nothing wrong with that.
See, you misread everything I say. My argument with fatt goes far beyond
Yoko. I don't care if he hates her, hell, 3/4 of the civilized world does.
No skin off my nose. My points to him (which you obviously miss by a mile)
are involved in his online posting in general. But then this is just an
excuse to try and justify your own warped need for my attention. Well, ok.
You got it. Now what? I'm a doody-head? Aw. OK. Anything else?
I don't much care for her
> either. And you are replying to EVERY little thing I write. I predict
> this is be replied to with the usual overly defensive rantings. I am
> really making you melt like cheese. <g>
Who is responding to whom? Kind of hard to tell after awhile, but I find it
telling and amusing that you are trying to pull a victory out of your ass by
using the lamest of all lame troll bits.
>
> > You are a truly stupid ( as evidenced by your little girl droolings over
all
> > things Glligan of all people), vain, without clue, needing attention of
some
> > sort (just guessing here), probably as worthles to your family and
frineds
> > and <shudder> mate as you are to anyone online...and you're going to
tell me
> > about myself? heh. Good one.
>
> At least I can spell. LOL! Oh, you're too funny. Unintentionally, of
> course. . . You're right, I don't have any "frineds"! hehe! Again,
> you can't write "Gilligan". *sigh* Just call him "Gil" maybe that
> might be easier for you. You really are losing it.
Wow. Retarded spelling /typo flames. Yes, I see now that you will -not- be
accepted into Troll Kindergarten after all, nor into Troll Daycare. Go home
and suck the troll teat a few more years and try again. You are as weak and
lame as they come.
>
> > Paranoid? You're not the one being attacked by trolls unworthy to lick
my
> > shoes. You're not the one being forged. No, you're just an innocent
> > bystander who felt sooo compelled to let me and the world know how litle
you
> > think of my posts.
>
> Yes. Yet, you're still in rmb despite Chew and the gang. <shrug>
Exactly. While you scream at the top of your lungs that you'll stay and say
whatever you damned well want, the fact remains that the LAST person I would
allow to run me off would be Chew. I think you sort of understand the
concept, but it keeps eluding you like a butterfly.
> Obviously that's your choice but I do wonder why you think writing in
> rmb is worth all this stress. Are you a masochist? Why don't you go
> to the moderated message boards on the web where you can talk about the
> Beatles and don't have worry about trolls and forgers.
And why don't you?
>
> > OK. Mission accomplished. You can go back to ignoring and berating
your
> > hubby now, because I sure as hell didn't sign up with you and where he
HAS
> > to take your ***, I don't.
>
> I'm still here. I will still continue to say what I think about you,
> as will others I'm sure.
See? There it is.
Yes, of course they will, I'm not screaming in all caps for people to stop
talking about me. Like...uh...you.
>
> > Stupid? I have my moments, granted, not as many as you.
>
> Oh, you're just saying that because you're mad and you want to lash out
> at me. <hehe!> I take you as seriously as Cheese Whiz. See, I'm not
> mad and defensive am I?
Calling myself stupid is lashing out at you? Wow. Wow. I cannot fathom
how you get out of bed in the morning, your mental faculties are absolutely
non-existent.
>
> > Prick? Welllllll.....yeah, ok, I'l give ya that one. Must be all these
> > friendly warm people who are so concerned about me here. Like you.
> >
> > *~Ginger~*
>
> You finally said *something* right
Gee, your approval means so much to me!
You see, I DO know my flaws (most of them anyway) and I don't spend my life
denying them like most of the trolls here do. Yet everyone is so nice they
always want to share with me their thoughts on how much better I could be
with their advice. Feh.
>
> *~Ginger~*
>
> I predict Charlie will respond to this, line by line, with his
> trademark stupid, petty immature insults, because that's all he know
> how to do. He never takes good advice, he only jumps up and down while
> foaming at the mouth and finally blows a fuse. It's kind of
> entertaining, actually.
if you actually give me good advice I will consider it. I've yet to see
any, not from you anyway.
>
> Hey Charlie! Come here boy! <whistle>
Wow. What's lamer than lame? Besides Old Cyn here I mean?
I'm so glad you have openly admitted you are only here to troll. That's a
good first step. Now, either learn HOW to or at least develop some sort
of...I dunno...style, wit, intelligence...anything. Then maybe we can move
on from there.
Until then your acting as if you are NOT responding to my every reply is
pretty hilarious in itself.
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Forgery: When Harry Met Sally: When Chuckie Meets Stefan...
- Previous by thread: Re: Forgery: Lennon's Adulterous Affair With Photographer's Wife
- Index(es):