Re: Convention Hall Seating Plan


<nyp212@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cfea8858-c7be-41f0-b834-de75ea219c8f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 22, 9:32 am, "Burton Busk" <burton...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<nyp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:448c5ba1-a1fe-4cb2-8030-c590f7572678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 21, 7:39 am, "Burton Busk" <burton...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<nyp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:8683b9e9-2deb-4f53-bdb0-94f5a671dcba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hard to find a recent seating plan for CH. Is there a GA area, or
what? I was told my tickets were in 'section 2". That doesn't jibe
with the one old chart I found. That one had a GA section on the
floor. TM doesn't have one when you click through to it. Any
suggestions?

How about jumping off a bridge?

"good one!...got any more pithy comebacks in that small sack of words
you've got?"

You'll just have to wait and see, you miserable little creep.

"Jeez you are a really angry person 'burton'. Perhaps you should see
someone about it, after all I just responded to your post about $100
being a lot of money, and you sent me a private e-mail containing an
obscenity."

This post if full of lies, inaccuracies, and cowardly passive-aggressive
tactics, but I'm not surprised.
You responded to my post saying $100 is a lot of money by posting "Don't
fookin' go, that would please a lot of people". That was a nasty response,
totally uncalled for. As was emailing me privately. You shouldn't be
surprised that both replies contained "obscenities".

"Now your issuing veiled threats."

You're a liar, and a bad speller. Show me where I threatened you, liar.

" I thought we were both
just exercising our right to free speech. How come some people feel
they have the right, and when someone else uses it, and they don't
like it or agree with it,they become a target of that other persons
insecurities, anxieties, fears, what ever."

You tell me. All I did was say I thought $100 was expensive, correct? You
took it from there.

" from your post history, you
seem like a reasonable person, even share some of my opinions/likes,.
That regarding music.If we had written in the past on other topics we
would probably would be on decent terms. However, every post has to
stand on its own, regardless of the posters history, or standing, in a
particular group. That being said, I only apologize for initially
sending my reply to your e-mail."

Accepted. Don't ever email me again. But you also need to apologize for your
nasty reply post to my original comment. And for the lies and tactics used
in this very post.

" I was unfamiliar w/ the google
interface, and believed I responding to your particular post in the
group."

So, you've been posting here for 10 years, but are unfamiliar on how to
differentiate between a post and an email? Okay, I suppose that's possible.

" I quickly posted the almost identical comment to the group,"

You know that isn't true. Your post was way more nasty than the email.

"which was an ironic comment on your "word", and on your intended
sentiment."

An ironic comment? LOL, come on, man. Who do you think you're fooling?
As far as my intended sentiment, what are you, a psychiatrist? My intent was
to say $100 is a lot of money for a rehearsal, which is exactly what I
posted. If you saw anything beyond that, you're just paranoid.

"This is just the way the internet, or newsgroups anyhow, are intended
to work. I made no personal attacks on you"

You, sir, are a liar. How can you say that?

" or your family. If your
that thin skinned then you should be cautious of what you post, and
your reaction to it."

Ah, okay, now I'm thin-skinned, I see. And I should be cautious when I post
a comment that says I think $100 is expensive? You're out of your mind.

" Maybe I touched a nerve, it was not my intention."

Liar.

"I happen to be feeling a lot of financial pressure myself, so if $100
is too expensive, I respect your opinion,"

Maybe that should have been your original post, instead of the nasty way you
handled it?

" and also you should mine."

I did. Did I ever make a comment that you were stupid for paying that price?
Of course not, I don't give a shit how people spend their money.

"Which is you don't like something, don't go/watch/support or otherwise
fund it."

And apparently, don't comment on it? I thought that's what newsgroups were
for.

"again I don't appreciate some of your words or intentions, though I
think you may be coming from a place I don't fully appreciate or
understand,"

That's for damn sure.

" but free speech itself does have some limitations."

ROFLMAO!!!! So, free speech is great, unless I say something that bothers
you? You are a piece of work.

"BTW I am not new to this group, I have been reading and posting here
for over 10 years, but on a different OS with a different program, so
my e-mail and name was something I couldn't change as quickly as I
wanted to. I wish you well, as there are a lot of things going bad in
the world, and some of them are happening to me as well. Good Luck if
you wish to attend the CH shows, or just hit the beach, as I have done
on other occasions."

No, 'Jay', don't worry, I won't be there.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Political posts and offensive racial remarks
    ... I apologize ... I am truly sorry.The intent of response was not meant to be as nasty as it ...
    (rec.outdoors.fishing.fly)
  • Re: Political posts and offensive racial remarks
    ... I apologize ... I am truly sorry.The intent of response was not meant to be as nasty as it ...
    (rec.outdoors.fishing.fly)
  • Re: Online poker RNG...
    ... the author would likely use it to make money. ... their RNG generation, then no, the RNG can't be cracked. ... I was happy to pay her for not giving a literal response. ... "Say, my neighbor is about to reshingle his roof, and wants to know ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Convention Hall Seating Plan
    ... That was a nasty response, ... Show me where I threatened you, liar. ... just exercising our right to free speech. ... nasty reply post to my original comment. ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)