Re: Bloomberg for President



Bluetele wrote:
"Evolution" <myname@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eqOdnbYuUuDcyhnanZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Robert Wiersema wrote:
"angelagrace" <cryinthesun@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d5dd241f-792f-426d-ba06-94f5766f701b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Robert Wiersema wrote:

You read Zeke's comment -- that he would vote for any Dem but Hilary --
as a sexist statement, because that's the lens through which you view
the world. That's fine, we all have our perspectives and viewpoints.
However, to respond to him suggesting that his reluctance to vote for
Hilary was due to his "problem with strong women" assumed facts not in
evidence: there are, literally, dozens of non-gender-based reasons not
to vote for that candidate, many of which have been elucidated in
various threads in the past few days.

I read the following as gender-based reasons not to vote for Hillary,
and no doubt I'll be flummoxed to find there's people who see a pure
political stance untainted by gender nonsense - here it is - Zeke on
Hillary:

[evidence snipped by Mr Logic to protect his ego]

Thanks, Angela -- I'm glad that someone took the time to go back and dig
up a year-old quote to support Laurie's kee-jerk, insulting, unrooted
response. Now she can point to this and say "Yeah! I knew it all along!
This, this is what I was referring to" and continue in her
self-righteousness without having had to do any of the heavy lifting for
herself.

You are most welcome, Mr Logic, anytime. I'm cursed with noticing
things and remembering them while some others are cursed with never
noticing those things and then assuming they don't exist. As the quote
plainly showed, Laurie's response was anything but unrooted, although
it may've been knee-jerk and insulting. You could be on your way to
earning those big boy pants by admitting you were wrong, as people are
always enjoining Laurie to do. I've seen her do it, yet I can't recall
any of those who demand it of her doing so. Strikes me kinda funny.

Is that necessary? Sounds like sour grapes to me...

Ah, but don't sour grapes make the sweetest whine?

Now that's a thing of succint beauty. I wish I could do that. Mr
Logic's probably jealous, too.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just turning off Limbo?
    ... |> insulting response, given that the intent you ascribe to my response ... I have attributed no intent to your ... | My interpretation of your words has nothing to do with whatever makes ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: OT: BUSH REPORTED TO BE ISOLATED, SULLEN, AND MOROSE (See Photo Link)
    ... newsclient or have an odd way of patching together a response. ... "To quote the previous message in your reply, ... Stuck calling people hippies when hippies have been gone for almost 40 ... Stuck in a pit of unresolved grudges which no one cares about. ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: OT: BUSH REPORTED TO BE ISOLATED, SULLEN, AND MOROSE (See Photo Link)
    ... > newsclient or have an odd way of patching together a response. ... > "How can I automatically quote the previous message when I post a reply?" ... > Stuck calling people hippies when hippies have been gone for almost 40 ... > Stuck in a pit of unresolved grudges which no one cares about. ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: Panasonic VCR PV-4760
    ... I responded the way I did to Kip, because I thought his post was insulting. ... This VCR has several circuit bards and I was hoping that someone might ... earlier response that was a good faith effort. ...
    (sci.electronics.repair)
  • Re: No-quoting isnt "bad". (was: newsgroups)
    ... in a real life conversation we don't 'quote' ... > and, when needed, we put a reference to the context in our response. ... Usenet threads carry on for ... > broken software and servers which have 'made' us get used to the ...
    (news.software.readers)
Loading