Re: Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- From: "Tom Mason" <tmaso@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:28:48 -0700
"Joe" <obri6133@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185909317.088384.137360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 31, 12:17 pm, Kevin McClave <kmccl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Why are John Edwards and Barack Obama almost always "Edwards" and
"Obama," while Hillary Clinton is almost as often "Hillary?" It can't be
to differentiate her from President Clinton, or why would we refer to
the current resident of the White House most often (when not a well
deserved derogatory nickname) as "Bush" with no differentiation from his
father?
I figure it's sexism. Hey, it even carries over to the Republicans,
where even dressing up in women's clothing gets Gulliani referred to
fairly frequently as "Rudy."
Always its sexism. Sheesh....cry me a river. Join the Republicans
Kevin. We march under a large umbrella. We're the first party that put
*** and bush in the white house....*** and bush together...as God
meant it to be :-)
All you guys have is jokes.
.
- References:
- Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- From: William Longyard
- Re: Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- From: Kevin McClave
- Re: Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- From: Joe
- Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- Prev by Date: NBC: O'Reilly loses Home Depot as advertiser as his sponsorship crumbles
- Next by Date: Re: NBC: O'Reilly loses Home Depot as advertiser as his sponsorship crumbles
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- Next by thread: Re: Bad Day for the Dems: NBC
- Index(es):