Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- From: robertwiersema@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Wiersema)
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:19 -0700
<Patrick1765@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:43?pm, "Robert Wiersema"
<robwISNTATh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<Patrick1...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176863991.915541.197530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 17, 10:31 pm, Patrick1...@xxxxxxx wrote:
http://insidecable.blogsome.com/
Cable News Ratings for April 16, 2007
Wow, that's compelling, Patrick. ?A series of numbers without context,
explanation or commentary, copied verbatim from some other source. ?You're a
master debater. ?Or something.
What's to figure out ? MSNBC has 110,000 less viewers on April 16th
( three days after Imus got fired ) than they did on March 16th
when Imus was still on with no controversy. Olbermann has 2 and a
half million viewers less than O'Reilly among viewers 25-54... an
age group that the pathetic Olbermann supporters have been saying
Keith is gaining on O'Reilly with. If he is gaining... he has a long
way to go.
See? That's context, explanation and commentary. It's still almost
completely meaningless and of little consequence to anyone but you, but
kudos on actually going the extra distance.
.
- References:
- Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- From: Patrick1765
- Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- From: Patrick1765
- Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- From: Robert Wiersema
- Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- From: Patrick1765
- Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- Prev by Date: Re: NBC: 91 MPH.....wtf??
- Next by Date: The" Surge" is working!
- Previous by thread: Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- Next by thread: Re: Olbermann... MSNBC suffering Imus backlash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading