Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: SMBalloon <smballoon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:30:37 -0500
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:35:10 GMT, Charlie Board
<charlieDIESPAMMERSboard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is nothing - absolutely nothing - subjective about noting
that people have to pay more (through higher payroll contributions,
higher copays and higher deductibles) for the EXACT SAME level
of healthcare they got five years ago. It's dishonest in the
extreme to say they're earning more in any sense just because
their employer is *also* paying more.
If more newer and advanced medical procedures are being used per
capita than 5 years ago, and more pharmaceuticals are being used per
capita than 5 years ago -- then that's hardly the EXACT SAME level of
healthcare as 5 years ago.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: Charlie Board
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- References:
- NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: Cathy Cohen
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: SMBalloon
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: Charlie Board
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: SMBalloon
- Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- From: Charlie Board
- NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- Prev by Date: Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- Next by Date: Re: NBC- Gee, I wonder who will win in the ratings ?
- Previous by thread: Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- Next by thread: Re: NBC: Are you better off than you were two years ago
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|