Re: Determining netkook status

Tim M. wrote:
On Aug 31, 10:44 am, Henry <9-11tr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim M. wrote:

How about one name of one person, Henry, who has told you that he or
she was convinced by your arguments?

Rachel, Randy, Paul, Eathan, Bob, Ramona, Lisa, John, and
many many more. But the people who were convinced changed
their minds due to a lot of factors, and I have to give much
of the credit to their intelligence, and to the people who put
up their excellent research on the 'net.
Just for the record, do you think all the people listed
below are kooks, and that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld told
you the truth about 9-11?

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/911-roster.html

Great, now we're getting somewhere.

I am - you're not. You're still incapable of answering
questions regarding your insane cartoon conspiracy
theory. There are several reasons for that - one is that
any honest discussion of your conspiracy theory proves that
it not only contradicts the evidence, but that it's quite
literally physically impossible. The other is that you lack
the honesty and integrity to examine your beliefs. Thanks
for proving my point again - even though it wasn't quite
what you had in "mind".


Let us know if you disagree with anything written below, and
if so, what and why. The writer proves that gradual weaken due
to heat couldn't possibly have caused WTC7's sudden, free fall,
and symmetric drop, and he uses a clear, logical combination of
evidence, basic physics, and common sense to do it.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/LeggeLastTry4.pdf


"If you think about the nature of the collapse, supposedly due to
fire weakening the steel, you will agree that it would only be
necessary to follow the early stages of the collapse to determine
its character. If heat is the cause, the steel will weaken gradually
and will start to sag in the region where the fire is most intense.
At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up
the weight of the building, but not quite. So we have the force of
gravity acting downwards, trying to produce an acceleration of 32
feet per second per second, and the force of the hot steel pushing
upwards, a force a bit less than that of gravity. Let us say we are
looking at it at the moment when the strength has declined to the
point where the steel is capable of pushing upwards with 90% of the
force required to hold the building up against gravity. There would
thus be a net downward force of 10% of gravity. Now acceleration is
proportional to force and we have a net force of 10% of gravity
so we would see an acceleration downwards of 3.2 feet per second
per second.
When you graph the data you find that the fall did not start with a
motion which could be ascribed to a small net force of that order.
The downward acceleration of the roof was very close to free fall
right from the start, 30 feet per second per second, and continued
at that rate until out of sight. There is no hint of a slow start.
This tells us that the steel supports went from adequate strength to
virtually no strength in an instant. For reasons stated above this is
absolutely impossible if the loss of strength is due to the application
of heat."










--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.911truth.org
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lockerbie/101st
    ... the steel will weaken gradually ... At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up ... trying to produce an acceleration of 32 ... a force a bit less than that of gravity. ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Determining netkook status
    ... the steel will weaken gradually ... At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up ... trying to produce an acceleration of 32 ... a force a bit less than that of gravity. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Determining netkook status
    ... the steel will weaken gradually ... At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up ... trying to produce an acceleration of 32 ... a force a bit less than that of gravity. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Determining netkook status
    ... the steel will weaken gradually ... At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up ... trying to produce an acceleration of 32 ... a force a bit less than that of gravity. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Twibil, Keith, butt buddies, or just roaming maggots?
    ... the steel will weaken gradually ... At that moment the steel will have almost enough strength to hold up ... trying to produce an acceleration of 32 ... a force a bit less than that of gravity. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)