Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood



On Oct 24, 12:14 pm, Bama Brian <bamaNOTbr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
oasysco wrote:
On Oct 24, 1:42 am, "P. Roehling" <nowayj...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"oasysco" <wilderkom...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote

The last thing Planned Parenthood is about is Planned Parenthood -
everybody knows that. It's a euphemism for population control. When
you're in the business of killing for profit, compliance with the law
isn't foremost on your to-do list.
Congratulations, Sir!

Because of your obviously Christian morals we're certain that you'll be a
great adoptive parent for the three thousand two hundred and sixty three
unwanted minority babies that are now on the way to your doorstep, C.O.D.
We're sure that you'll want to take out a second, third, and forth mortgage
on your home to pay for the best upbringings that money can buy!

Well, if you're on the other side of the philosophical divide then you
know "it takes a village to raise a child", not just a high-minded
individual. You don't have to take in babies on our doorstep. There
are many worthy organizations that provide alternatives, shelter, and
medical support. All you have to do is support them monetarily and
with your time, if possible. Remember, there is a waiting list of
people waiting to adopt children.

For blond, blue-eyed healthy children. Not for those crack-addicted,
HIV positive, non-white race babies.



Ya see, if ya wanna impose your religious beliefs on the rest of the world,
you're gonna have to pay for the results, one way or another.

I'm not imposing anything. I'm pointing out fact - population control
is the mission of Planned Parenthood.

Six and a half billion Naked Apes breeding themselves and this planet
into destruction aren't enough for you? But I digress...



Surely, you don't think PP has some loftier goal in mind other than
population control, do you? I mean, that's the essence of abortion -
control of the population from the most important end of the spectrum:
if babies aren't born, they can't have kids and their kids won't have
kids and so on, effectively wiping entire generations off future
history.

If you are an abortion rights activist or believer, shouldn't you
should rejoice that 32 people died at VA Tech last spring? Most of
them were students just entering their child bearing years. Now, they
will have no kids who can have kids and so on.

Now there's a true Straw Man argument. You get to feed it.



And you should not regret the death of one child, 10, 50, 1000
children who die in the inner cities of any nation. They won't have
kids born into poverty, surely making the world a better place,
right?

SM



And you'll be in good company, sharing the same philosophy with
racial, ethnic, relgious, and economic supremacists everywhere - the
elimination of "sub classes" of people through systematic killing in
the name of war, state-sponsored genocide, witholding of vital medical
care and food, or simply through abortion. Keep in mind that abortion
is but only one means to and end; there are others that you must
decide on which decide you come down.

SM



And let's not forget the next hurdle to be breached is the elimination
of elderly. Since they don't pose a threat for repopulation, movements
in that area may be harder to recognize, perhaps taking the form of
euthanasia - a patient's right to die... or if not the patient, the
patient's guardian's right to end life.

SM. Next you'll be on about short people: "Got little hands and little
feet; Nasty little voices going beep beep beep..."



Certainly, there will be an outcry of the costs of keeping these
people alive at a cost to the state. Indeed, the outcry has begun...

We hear almost daily how the SocSec system in the US is solvent for
only the next 40 years, but in the next 10 will start paying out more
than it takes in; how eldery care costs will skyrocket over the next
20 years; how 10,000 new SS recipients are now receiving benefits now
that the baby boom generation has started retiring.

SM. And an absolute non-sequitur.



No need to worry, though. Abortion rights are firmly entrenched in
world society and they aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

One hopes so.



As for the profit making end of abortion, educate yourself as to how
that is accomplished. If you're going to argue for abortion, you owe
it to yourself to find out more about that in which you believe. It
will either make you offer up better arguments than the "baby on the
doorstep" or it will change your mind.

Let us know how many of the truly unfortunate babies you've adopted,
Greg. And don't skate on us by saying something like, "I give United
Way" or "I give to my church". Unless you're donating of your time, say
by working in that unwanted baby shelter, then your vote doesn't count.

The tired, old baby-on-the-doorstep argument, eh? Figgers.

When I mentioned people waiting for adoption, this guy counters
with...

Not for those crack-addicted, HIV positive, non-white race babies.

Don't kid yourself, buddy. Those less fortunate are the ones giving
birth. That's why people like you say they clog welfare rolls; you
know, they have babies to make money - that sort of thing. I think
you'd be surprised that a good number of the girls who go to these
clinics look just like you.

Nah, to get rid of "those crack-addicted, HIV positive, non-white race
babies", you'd have to resort to murder after birth. Are you implying
that's the next step?

Greg


--
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood
    ... It's a euphemism for population control. ... they can't have kids and their kids won't have ... If you are an abortion rights activist or believer, ... As for the profit making end of abortion, ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood
    ... It's a euphemism for population control. ... they can't have kids and their kids won't have ... If you are an abortion rights activist or believer, ... As for the profit making end of abortion, ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood
    ... It's a euphemism for population control. ... You don't have to take in babies on our doorstep. ... they can't have kids and their kids won't have ... If you are an abortion rights activist or believer, ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood
    ... It's a euphemism for population control. ... There are plenty of kids who aren't young white males that are waiting to be adopted. ... care and food, or simply through abortion. ... As for the profit making end of abortion, ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Kansas throws the book at Planned Parenthood
    ... I'm pointing out fact - population control ... they can't have kids and their kids won't have ... If you are an abortion rights activist or believer, ... there will be an outcry of the costs of keeping these ...
    (rec.motorcycles)

Loading