Re: You guys check this and tell me...


Turby wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 11:37:47 -0700, "tomorrow@xxxxxxxxx"
<tomorrow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Venture Rider wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 10:08:40 -0700, tomorrow@xxxxxxxxx said:

Did you read the article? Did you even comprehend it?

I did. And I did. What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing
with it, and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such
questions?

I can't always tell when you're being serious and when you're being
sarcastic. That's no big deal, but I'm not sure you can tell, either.

Oh, I can always tell ;-)

If it makes you feel better, my lovely bride of these past 28 years
(plus five years as best friends prior to that) can't always tell,
either. And it drives her CRAZY.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ... I'm glad you comprehend the article, so maybe you can answer a question. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Effective kill list for this group?
    ... My posting of a kill list wasn't ... After reading my response I realise it was a bit reactionary, ... worthless rehashing of past flame wars. ... Thunderbird needs to be able to filter by ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
Loading