Re: You guys check this and tell me...


Alan B wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 11:37:47 -0700, in message
<1157395067.658809.266400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"tomorrow@xxxxxxxxx" <tomorrow@xxxxxxxxx> scribed:

Did you read the article? Did you even comprehend it?

I did. And I did. What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing
with it, and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such
questions?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1415985.shtml

I'm glad you comprehend the article, so maybe you can answer a question.
What the hell is an "imminent scientist?"

A PhD (to be) whose review committee has not yet met?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: You guys check this and tell me...
    ... What part of me reading it, quoting it, agreeing ... and thanking you for posting the link to it predicated such ... I'm glad you comprehend the article, so maybe you can answer a question. ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Effective kill list for this group?
    ... My posting of a kill list wasn't ... After reading my response I realise it was a bit reactionary, ... worthless rehashing of past flame wars. ... Thunderbird needs to be able to filter by ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
Loading